Visitors' civil comments encouraged.

National Call-in Day for Real Health Care Reform


Sharyn - Posted on 12 February 2009

Today, Thursday, 02/12/2009, is a National Call-in Day to express support for National Health Insurance legislation (HR 676).    Take a minute to call Congress and the President. 

On my own homefront, the state of New Hampshire is pushing the U.S. Congress and the president to nationalize health care.   See below for a copy of the state resolution (HCR 2) recently sent on to D.C. 

Here are the numbers for you to call today (be sure to specify HR 676 in your message):

Congressional switchboard: 202-225-3121

President's office:    

  Comments: 202-456-1111
  Switchboard: 202-456-1414

  email:  http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/ 
...........................................................

cc New Hampshire's Resolution:

HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 2

A RESOLUTION endorsing the National Health Insurance Act.

SPONSORS: Rep. McEachern, Rock 16; Rep. Splaine, Rock 16

COMMITTEE: Commerce

ANALYSIS

This house concurrent resolution endorses the National Health Insurance Act.

09-0217

01/10

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Nine

A RESOLUTION endorsing the National Health Insurance Act.

Whereas, every person in New Hampshire and in the United States deserves access to affordable, quality health care; and

Whereas, there is a growing crisis in health care in the United States of America, manifested in rising health care costs, increased premiums, out-of-pocket spending, and decreased international business competitiveness; and

Whereas, approximately 135,000 New Hampshire citizens lacked health insurance in 2006; and

Whereas, those insured now often experience burdensome medical debt; and

Whereas, 1/2 of all personal bankruptcies are due to illnesses or medical bills; and

Whereas, the increasing expense of Medicaid and the rising costs of insuring state employees and teachers can best be met not by limiting benefits, but by expanding them under a national, publicly-funded health insurance program; and

Whereas, the complex bureaucracy arising from our fragmented, for-profit, multi-payer system of health care financing consumes approximately 30 percent of the United States health care spending while Medicare has a 3 percent overhead; and

Whereas, United States Representative John Conyers introduced HR 676, the United States National Health Insurance Act, in the United States House of Representatives for the 110th Congress; and

Whereas, this Act would provide a universal, comprehensive, single-payer system of high quality national health insurance; now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives, the Senate concurring:

That the New Hampshire general court respectfully urges the United States Congress to enact the United States National Health Insurance Act sponsored by Representative Conyers; and

That copies of this resolution be transmitted by the house clerk to the President of the United States and to members of the New Hampshire congressional delegation.

 

Share/Save
Your rating: None

Legislators have been saying they have been flooded with calls from the right-wing on the stimulus bill.  Where are the grassroots progressives?   Are they just so disappointed in the new president that they are giving up?  We need to start doing some call flooding ourselves!

The supposed progressives won the day and moved on.  They elected their champion, their demi-god and just assume he's looking out for them so they can go back to worrying about who's guest starring on CSI or whether to watch Survivor or Ugly Betty.

 

 

Civil Discourse - ERA - A Mother President - Women's Rights - Primary Reform

so our reps will be hearing more from center-right citizens, and that's the direction we'll go, but the Obama progressives won't care because they made history with the first AA prez.  Obama progressives weren't real progressives anyway.  So I guess we really are a pretty small minority.

He cites irreconcilable differences with the bums in charge. Too bad Hillary didn't do that.

I was fixing to put up a blog entry on it.

You almost have to feel sorry for Gregg.  When Obama nominated him to be Sec'y of Commerce, Dems screamed "foul" because of the upcoming census.  Evidently they thought he'd only count Republicans, being one himself.  Then Mr. All-Things-To-All-People decided to keep an eye on the census himself, from the White House.  Now Reps are hollering "Interference!"

Excuse the choice of words, but Obama's nominating process is turning into a major clusterf*ck.  I hear his ratings went up after that PR tour and staged questions in Florida.  That bump won't last in the face of this latest embarrassment.

The interesting thing about Gregg is that he withdrew voluntarily and under no cloud, so far as I can see.  Obama and staff are said to be "stunned" and "angry" about Gregg's decision.

Pass the popcorn, please.  Who's next?

Linky:

 

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/02/12/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry...

 

WHERETHEHELL IS MY ERA???

State and federal lawmakers are focusing increas­ingly on health care reform, and a growing number are expressing serious interest in "patient-focused" or "consumer-centered" approaches. This is certainly a positive development. The industry really need this reform, especially since so many people that are only after the most basic of care have to get emergency cash loans to cover something as simple as a simple antibiotics script, and a full third of the nation is without health insurance.  The lead researcher for the Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care, Elliot Fisher, a practitioner for over 20 years, has pointed out that areas that spend more on health care interestingly spend more on unnecessary procedures, and have higher mortality rates.  So why do we need payday cash advances for health care that is worse when more expensive?