Burlington, Vermont, Says “No” to F-35s in Its Community, Setting Off a Chain Reaction

Politicians and developers are pushing for the F-35s over the concerns of the citizens that will be affected by them.

Citing concerns over crashes and an environmental impact statement showing the health dangers posed by noise pollution, citizens of Burlington voted to cancel the basing of 18 F-35 fighter bombers near their city. Following the vote, three city councils passed resolutions against the basing, despite a massive campaign by Vermont’s political establishment to host the aircraft.

Politicians and developers are pushing for the F-35s over the concerns of the citizens that will be affected by them. (Photo: Robert Sullivan / Flickr)

The F-35 fighter bomber is screamingly loud. The US Air Force also says that the F-35 has a high crash rate. A Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division report describes releases of toxic, carcinogenic and mutagenic chemicals, particulates and fibers during combustion of a military carbon composite aircraft body, making the consequences of an F-35 crash in a city catastrophic.

A proposal to base 18 F-35 fighter bombers at the city-owned airport in Burlington, Vermont, would put nearly 3,000 small working-class homes in a noise danger zone that the 2013 US Air Force Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) says will impair children’s learning and cognitive development.

Notwithstanding lockstep support by the Vermont political and commercial establishment, the plan to base the fighter bombers in Burlington was shaken up in March when citizens voted to cancel the basing. While the vote was a major step toward revoking the plan, a bit more than a democratic vote of the people may be needed in view of the enthusiasm for F-35 basing that Burlington Mayor Miro Weinberger, US Sen. Patrick Leahy and commercial real estate developers continue …read more

Via:: Truthout

      

, ,

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply